1 · 2
This is an archive of the Votes for Featured Articles from its inception in May 2012 up to September 2013, at which time a new system was implemented.
July 2012 |
---|
Comments[]Okay, so, my nominations. Yes, I know it says right there "one nomination per person". Making an exception here, just to kick things off. For circumstantial simultaneity, okay, yeah, I'm possibly biased, because I wrote almost all of it, but hear me out. It may not be a very long article, but it's concise and I think illustrates the concept reasonably well (especially given that the concept is stated to be not fully comprehensible). It's also a good example of an article that has exactly the right number of images. Could it have more added? Probably. Does it need more? Nope -- Sorceror Nobody, 14:05, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Comments edited due to having cleaned up the Grist page, 20:18, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
|
August 2012 |
---|
Comments[]Debating whether to nominate Circumstantial Simultaneity again... hmm, FFWiki has a rule about no article being nominated two months in a row. I think we'll be less strict than that, but... I will add a similar rule now. Which will mean I can't nominate CS this month -- Sorceror Nobody, 14:57, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Okay, so, critique time. Hemospectrum... yeah, okay, it's a pretty good article, if subject to some controversy lately. But dream self is actually kind of poor. Most of the images are not relevant; we certainly should not have a column of them down one side of the page (note to self, get back to work on writing the MoS), and a gallery would probably be far more suitable for showing the kids' and trolls' dream selves, rather than cramping together two sets of four messily at the top. Also the page could do with a lot more links to HS pages than it has currently. So yeah, long story short, I personally think the dream self article is not up to standard at the moment -- Sorceror Nobody, 12:17, July 16, 2012 (UTC) |
September 2012 |
---|
Comments[]Note that Doc Scratch is not eligible for nomination this month -- Sorceror Nobody, 12:50, August 1, 2012 (UTC) Hey kids! It's that time again! SN critiques the FA nominations! *canned applause*
Also I'm not sure how best to deal with the anon vote. We certainly don't have a rule against it, but it might count as less than a full vote if we're still tied on votes come the end of the month. I'll have to discuss that with my fellow staff -- Sorceror Nobody, 19:33, August 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
October 2012 |
---|
Comments[]No other candidates? SC, Thief of Time 20:12, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
November 2012 |
---|
Comments[]Seriously going to need nominations this month -- Sorceror Nobody, 16:54, October 1, 2012 (UTC) how about post scratch earth? fitting for november (the whole 11 11 11 thing) and would animate people to read and therefore edit it. poor article doesnt have any pictures. --188.2.15.230 22:31, October 4, 2012 (UTC) I dunno... Lusus? I've always thought it's a well laid-out article. --NikLink (talk) 22:54, October 4, 2012 (UTC) Skaia? Lord English? Has Doc Scratch been nominated yet? Aepokk Venset 01:32, October 5, 2012 (UTC) Lusus, Skaia, English and Doc Scratch are all eligible for nomination this month, and I would therefore encourage people to nominate them if they wish (though I bet they all have things that could be tidied up). Post-Scratch Earth isn't an article (and probably should stay that way), but even if it were, it would need to be brought up to standard before being nominated -- Sorceror Nobody, 19:05, October 9, 2012 (UTC) Hell yeah it is. [[Post-scratch future Earth|post scratch ''future'' earth]] is, and thats totaly what i meant. if PSFE isnt standard enough then how about Betty Crocker? also fits the novermber theme, since she took over the world in november. btw, the rules say only 1 nomnation/vote per user.--188.2.15.230 22:27, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
I wouldn't recommend English, Doc Scratch, or Snowman until an ongoing issue with them is fixed. - The Light6 (talk) 23:25, October 9, 2012 (UTC) |
December 2012 |
---|
Comments[]Another month where there's only one nomination. Not good -- Sorceror Nobody, 18:44, November 1, 2012 (UTC) If we ever make a Sandy article I would nominate that, just for support, but if not why not the Homestuck Adventure Game? _☮__ƒelinoel___ 18:55, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
I can't nominate twice, but what do you guys think of nominating the Aspect page? I think adding the color scheme layouts really improved upon it. Aepokk Venset 21:12, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
January 2013 |
---|
Comments[]Just going to start this up so we have a featured article next month. Chezrush {Talk} 15:24, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
Except the tabber is still broken on his page. Someone simply removed the title template. - The Light6 (talk) 05:10, December 18, 2012 (UTC) Suggestion revoked Aepokk Venset 05:12, December 18, 2012 (UTC) How about we feature a problem sleuth related article for a change? Or do we want to stick featuring articles relating to the current adventure?bitterLime 21:35, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Did an overhaul of Alterniabound so nominating that, it still needs a few touchups but they should be done by the end of the month. And with that there are three nominations and voting opens. - The Light6 (talk) 18:03, December 23, 2012 (UTC) On the Class article nomination, I am currently predicting some exposition on the Maid class (and its counterpart) in a week or two. So I guess it might be good to have it featured when that info is revealed, or it might be better to feature it next month instead of having a big shake up in the middle of the month. Of course that all depends on whether my prediction holds up (I am posting it on the Class talk page). - The Light6 (talk) 16:09, December 30, 2012 (UTC) I think class definetly deserves a feature, but I agree with the light6 that this month may be bad timing. Especially since we also might get to see the prince, rogue and page sprites soon, which would help giving the page a more unified look. So ideally I would like to feature class once that happened. - bitterLime 17:57, December 30, 2012 (UTC) All good points. Wouldn't want to rescind my nomination now though, as people have started voting. I suppose I'll just leave it up there. Or maybe change it? Aepokk Venset 22:19, December 30, 2012 (UTC) |
February 2013 |
---|
Comments[]The Sprite clean-up was just the information sections, not the tables, I intend to do those too but those are a small part and should easily be done before the end of the month. As such I am just going to nominate it now. - The Light6 (talk) 13:53, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
Once again it would appear that some nominations are being made for the wrong reasons. Not that those reasons are detrimental to a nomination, just that they should never be the main reason given. That said, Eridan is not a bad page by any means, and a bad nomination rationale doesn't invalidate the quality of a page. Warhammer of Zillyhoo, by contrast, is a pretty thin page; frankly, if it weren't for the fact that it originated from Problem Sleuth, it probably wouldn't warrant a page to itself – though it may yet be merged into Legendary weapons at some point, now that I think about it -- Sorceror Nobody, 13:47, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
March 2013 |
---|
Comments[]Well, I've just completed a very substantial rewrite of the Lil Cal article, and it is now almost perfectly fit for featuring. Ideally, it could do with a few more MSPA links, and possibly one or two well-chosen images, as well as a better image to replace the current one of Dirk's room. Other than that, it's good to go. Hee hee -- Sorceror Nobody, 02:35, February 28, 2013 (UTC) |
April 2013 |
---|
Comments[]A 413-themed suggestion might be nice, though as ever, it should not be the driving reason behind a nomination. That said, if anyone wants to do massive cleanup on John's article (and I do mean massive) over the next month, he may be a good choice. The 413 article is unlikely ever to look presentable enough for FA, as it's just a huge list -- Sorceror Nobody, 13:26, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
August 2013 |
---|
Comments[]So, we had no nominations for featured articles last month. I'm wondering what the reason is: was the nomination and voting process not advertised enough, or are there just no other articles that currently qualify for featured article status? And in either case, how do we fix it? lp2277 | Talk 16:44, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Yeah we seriously need to get on our game here, and replace that massively spoiler article. Aepokk Venset 18:52, June 2, 2013 (UTC) Changed it to August since obviously we're already past the start of July. Also since we're still getting blackout weeks as a tail to the megapause, it seems likely that we won't be back to full speed until near the end of this month anyway. So, FA will officially resume in August. Get nominating, people! -- Sorceror Nobody, 12:40, July 10, 2013 (UTC)'
...okay so it would appear that all of the admins, myself included, forgot about updating the FA at the start of the month. So, everyone has until tomorrow to nominate another article, if they want to squeeze a nomination in at the last minute. And, what the hell, I declare voting open on these two, since it makes little difference to break that rule for less than a day -- Sorceror Nobody, 21:51, August 5, 2013 (UTC) |
September 2013 |
---|
Problem Sleuth (character)]] - technically this is the MSPA wiki, not just the Homestuck wiki and I feel like we should have some diversity. --Chezrush {Talk} 23:15, August 6, 2013 (UTC) Comments[]Ok this is getting pathetic. We really need to step our game up since everyone that enters the wiki will see this. Chezrush {Talk} 23:13, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
If lp2277 and I can manage to make Going beyond the gameplay a respectable article over the next few weeks, I'm nominating it. Aepokk Venset 23:33, August 7, 2013 (UTC) Hm. I was entirely prepared, if somewhat resignedly, to accept the sole nomination for this month's FA, because obviously that's the protocol. But even just trimming the opening text for the FA template, I'm having to grit my teeth at the cleanup that text alone ought to have, to say nothing of the article as a whole. So I'm not sure it's entirely suitable FA material. I'm seriously in two minds on this. I think part of the reason we've had no non-HS featured articles, aside from the obvious one of popularity, is likely that the non-HS articles are severely under-maintained, despite – or maybe even because of – the fact that those adventures have ended : / -- Sorceror Nobody, 20:24, September 1, 2013 (UTC) |